There are two main types of printing technology in inkjet printers. One is the micro piezoelectric printing technology represented by epson; the other is thermal inkjet printing technology represented by hp and canon. No matter what kind of inkjet printing technology is used, the jamming of the print head is almost impossible to avoid. The manufacturer's solution is to flush the print head before the printer works. The ink in the ink cartridge is already scarce. And the original ink is expensive. Who should bear the cost of flushing the print head? From today's major brands of ink-jet printing equipment, the cost of wasting ink to flush the print head is still the burden on consumers?
â— Who should pay for inkjet printers?
From the secret discovered in an inkjet machine test, the Lexmark s408 inkjet machine, after installing the print head and ink cartridge, the ink capacity has decreased by about one-tenth, and the ink consumption of the print head is also manually flushed. Larger.
Inkjet equipment ink system includes two categories, one is the printhead and ink cartridge separate design, the other is the printhead and ink cartridge integrated design, the former is common in high-end inkjet equipment or business inkjet equipment, The life of the print head is relatively high. The latter is commonly used in medium and low-end inkjet devices. Each time the ink cartridges are replaced, the print heads are replaced together. Although the print heads are not blocked as much as possible, the cost of replacing the ink cartridges is relatively high.
From the perspective of cost, it seems that the consumables of the headwater separation design are relatively cheap. The user does not need to support the cost of the printhead to replace the ink cartridge. However, when the printhead is clogged or damaged, the replacement of the printhead also requires a large expenditure, such as the Epson R230 inkjet. The print head of the printer costs up to 800 yuan, which is equivalent to three-fifths of the purchase price of the machine. For users, this is also part of the cost of the post-maintenance.
â— The difference between head water separation and head water integration
Experience tells us that printers designed with “headwater separation†generally use 6-7 cartridges and should replace the new printheads, otherwise more and more “ink blocking†will occur, affecting print quality, and It also wastes a lot of ink to flush the print head. For a thermal ink jet printer using a "headwater one" printer, the printer head is replaced with a new one at the same time each time the ink is replaced. This is actually equivalent to replacing a new machine with a printer. For the "headwater separation" printer, the cost of the printhead is much higher than that of the "headwater integral" printhead. The cost of replacing a printhead is about 50% of the cost of the whole machine, which is mainly due to the use of pressure. The cost of each nozzle in the printhead of the electrical technology is relatively high.
"Headwater One" printers are less likely to clog ink heads than "Headwater Separated" printers, and because they are disposable nozzles, they are often replaced by new ones. During the entire process, ink jet nozzles are used. Always in a good working condition. Therefore, the "headwater integrated" printer can ensure satisfactory printing results by simply replacing the ink cartridge, which greatly reduces the cost and difficulty of printer maintenance. In other words, the manufacturer intends to design this maintenance-free solution: When the user may feel that the print quality is declining, the ink in the ink cartridge is almost exhausted. At this time, replacing the integrated ink cartridge can not only provide sufficient ink, but also It is logical to replace the print head with a new one to maintain stable print quality.
The "headwater separation" of the printer's nozzles uses mechanical vibration (such as piezoelectric technology) to spray ink droplets, plus every time only replace the ink cartridges without changing the nozzles, after replacing multiple print cartridges, with printing The increase in quantity not only makes it easy to clog, but also causes a reduction in printing accuracy due to mechanical wear and tear. In addition, the nozzle drive circuit board and the nozzle are installed together with high cost.
Regardless of whether it is a "headwater separation" or "headwater one" design of the print head, before each printer restarts work, I think users who have used inkjet printers will feel that the printer will automatically perform head cleaning. This process consumes a certain amount of ink, and flushing the ink from the print head does not print on the paper, but is a necessary process to ensure the proper operation of the print head. Therefore, I believe that this part of the ink consumed to flush the print head should not allow consumers to pay.
â— Inkjet printer flushing nozzles should be paid by manufacturers
Why did you come to this conclusion? First of all, consumers have already spent equipment purchase costs when they purchase printers, and in order to print, they need to purchase ink cartridges and other consumables. The ink in the ink cartridges should be used for printing documents or photos. Unfortunately, the actual situation is not the case. There is a considerable amount of ink. The daily cleaning of the print head is wasted, and these costs are still borne by the consumer. Although we can't accurately calculate how much ink is wasted on the cleaning of the print head each time, it is definitely more than one-tenth. Assume that a set of ink cartridges priced at 200-400 yuan, according to one-tenth of the cost is also 20-40 yuan, for consumers, especially individual users, long-term accumulation is also not a small expenditure.
In addition, we analyze why the printer will flush the print head? The first case is the automatic flushing before work, which consumes less ink, mainly to ensure that the ink in the print head is sufficient to ensure the print quality, and also to prevent the print head from jamming. In the second case, the user manually flushes the print head. In this case, the print head has generally been clogged. This method consumes more ink. Either way, this is due to the principle of the inkjet printer and the structure of the print head. Although it has experienced many years of technological research and development and innovation, the proportion of blocked print heads has been greatly reduced, but manufacturers can not guarantee that inkjet printers The print head does not jam when it is not used for a long time. Therefore, from a technical point of view, flushing the print head consumes ink to a certain extent due to product structure and design issues, not due to the user's cause. Therefore, from the perspective of the print head plug itself, the cost of the ink consumed to flush the print head should not be borne by the consumer.
Third, consumers use consumables in order to obtain the corresponding printed documents and photos. The ink consumed by flushing the print head can print a larger number of documents. Now it is wasted, but it is still calculated in the cost of consumables. This is certainly unreasonable. Is there any solution?
It is recommended that manufacturers, in the premise of technological innovation can not guarantee absolutely not plug, flush the ink of the print head should be borne by the manufacturer, such as increasing the ink cartridge capacity, some of the ink is prepared specifically for the flushing nozzle, and the cost Not by the consumer. In addition, the cost of consumables is further reduced, and the cost of the ink consumed to flush the print head is reduced to a negligible level. This is also a kind of support for consumers.
The status quo is that almost none of the manufacturers are doing this. The major brands are Hewlett-Packard, Canon, Epson, Lexmark, and Brother. These brand products still increase ink cartridge ink capacity to some extent while ensuring profit maximization. The cost of flushing the print head was not included in the real consumer's mind. Therefore, we hope that after the manufacturers can pay more attention to the actual needs of Chinese consumers, thus introducing reasonable solutions to help users reduce costs and reduce the frequency of printer failures.
â— Who should pay for inkjet printers?
From the secret discovered in an inkjet machine test, the Lexmark s408 inkjet machine, after installing the print head and ink cartridge, the ink capacity has decreased by about one-tenth, and the ink consumption of the print head is also manually flushed. Larger.
Inkjet equipment ink system includes two categories, one is the printhead and ink cartridge separate design, the other is the printhead and ink cartridge integrated design, the former is common in high-end inkjet equipment or business inkjet equipment, The life of the print head is relatively high. The latter is commonly used in medium and low-end inkjet devices. Each time the ink cartridges are replaced, the print heads are replaced together. Although the print heads are not blocked as much as possible, the cost of replacing the ink cartridges is relatively high.
From the perspective of cost, it seems that the consumables of the headwater separation design are relatively cheap. The user does not need to support the cost of the printhead to replace the ink cartridge. However, when the printhead is clogged or damaged, the replacement of the printhead also requires a large expenditure, such as the Epson R230 inkjet. The print head of the printer costs up to 800 yuan, which is equivalent to three-fifths of the purchase price of the machine. For users, this is also part of the cost of the post-maintenance.
â— The difference between head water separation and head water integration
Experience tells us that printers designed with “headwater separation†generally use 6-7 cartridges and should replace the new printheads, otherwise more and more “ink blocking†will occur, affecting print quality, and It also wastes a lot of ink to flush the print head. For a thermal ink jet printer using a "headwater one" printer, the printer head is replaced with a new one at the same time each time the ink is replaced. This is actually equivalent to replacing a new machine with a printer. For the "headwater separation" printer, the cost of the printhead is much higher than that of the "headwater integral" printhead. The cost of replacing a printhead is about 50% of the cost of the whole machine, which is mainly due to the use of pressure. The cost of each nozzle in the printhead of the electrical technology is relatively high.
"Headwater One" printers are less likely to clog ink heads than "Headwater Separated" printers, and because they are disposable nozzles, they are often replaced by new ones. During the entire process, ink jet nozzles are used. Always in a good working condition. Therefore, the "headwater integrated" printer can ensure satisfactory printing results by simply replacing the ink cartridge, which greatly reduces the cost and difficulty of printer maintenance. In other words, the manufacturer intends to design this maintenance-free solution: When the user may feel that the print quality is declining, the ink in the ink cartridge is almost exhausted. At this time, replacing the integrated ink cartridge can not only provide sufficient ink, but also It is logical to replace the print head with a new one to maintain stable print quality.
The "headwater separation" of the printer's nozzles uses mechanical vibration (such as piezoelectric technology) to spray ink droplets, plus every time only replace the ink cartridges without changing the nozzles, after replacing multiple print cartridges, with printing The increase in quantity not only makes it easy to clog, but also causes a reduction in printing accuracy due to mechanical wear and tear. In addition, the nozzle drive circuit board and the nozzle are installed together with high cost.
Regardless of whether it is a "headwater separation" or "headwater one" design of the print head, before each printer restarts work, I think users who have used inkjet printers will feel that the printer will automatically perform head cleaning. This process consumes a certain amount of ink, and flushing the ink from the print head does not print on the paper, but is a necessary process to ensure the proper operation of the print head. Therefore, I believe that this part of the ink consumed to flush the print head should not allow consumers to pay.
â— Inkjet printer flushing nozzles should be paid by manufacturers
Why did you come to this conclusion? First of all, consumers have already spent equipment purchase costs when they purchase printers, and in order to print, they need to purchase ink cartridges and other consumables. The ink in the ink cartridges should be used for printing documents or photos. Unfortunately, the actual situation is not the case. There is a considerable amount of ink. The daily cleaning of the print head is wasted, and these costs are still borne by the consumer. Although we can't accurately calculate how much ink is wasted on the cleaning of the print head each time, it is definitely more than one-tenth. Assume that a set of ink cartridges priced at 200-400 yuan, according to one-tenth of the cost is also 20-40 yuan, for consumers, especially individual users, long-term accumulation is also not a small expenditure.
In addition, we analyze why the printer will flush the print head? The first case is the automatic flushing before work, which consumes less ink, mainly to ensure that the ink in the print head is sufficient to ensure the print quality, and also to prevent the print head from jamming. In the second case, the user manually flushes the print head. In this case, the print head has generally been clogged. This method consumes more ink. Either way, this is due to the principle of the inkjet printer and the structure of the print head. Although it has experienced many years of technological research and development and innovation, the proportion of blocked print heads has been greatly reduced, but manufacturers can not guarantee that inkjet printers The print head does not jam when it is not used for a long time. Therefore, from a technical point of view, flushing the print head consumes ink to a certain extent due to product structure and design issues, not due to the user's cause. Therefore, from the perspective of the print head plug itself, the cost of the ink consumed to flush the print head should not be borne by the consumer.
Third, consumers use consumables in order to obtain the corresponding printed documents and photos. The ink consumed by flushing the print head can print a larger number of documents. Now it is wasted, but it is still calculated in the cost of consumables. This is certainly unreasonable. Is there any solution?
It is recommended that manufacturers, in the premise of technological innovation can not guarantee absolutely not plug, flush the ink of the print head should be borne by the manufacturer, such as increasing the ink cartridge capacity, some of the ink is prepared specifically for the flushing nozzle, and the cost Not by the consumer. In addition, the cost of consumables is further reduced, and the cost of the ink consumed to flush the print head is reduced to a negligible level. This is also a kind of support for consumers.
The status quo is that almost none of the manufacturers are doing this. The major brands are Hewlett-Packard, Canon, Epson, Lexmark, and Brother. These brand products still increase ink cartridge ink capacity to some extent while ensuring profit maximization. The cost of flushing the print head was not included in the real consumer's mind. Therefore, we hope that after the manufacturers can pay more attention to the actual needs of Chinese consumers, thus introducing reasonable solutions to help users reduce costs and reduce the frequency of printer failures.
Hyaluronic Acid Nose Reshaping Filling
Shijiazhuang Asa Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.hskinlift.com